Diskusjon:Loose Change

Det er interessant at "Opus" synes det er for nyttig å vite hvor Loose Change kan lastes ned. Er det så skummelt at folk flest kan laste ned Loose Change og lære at syv fysiske lover forteller at den latterlige offisielle konspirasjonsteorien som Wikipedia fremmer er fysisk umulig? (Se "historikk")— Dette usignerte innlegget ble skrevet av 85.25.135.126 (diskusjon · bidrag) (Husk å signere dine innlegg!)

Wikipedia er ikke et nettsted som lenker til piratkopieringsnettsteder. --mariu.le 6. sep 2006 kl. 11:40 (UTC)

100 millioner mennesker har sett Loose Change

Yet today, more than five years on, this accepted version of what happened on 9/11 is being challenged by a 90-minute internet movie made for £1,500 on a cheap laptop by three young American men. The film is so popular that up to 100 million viewers have watched what is being dubbed the first internet blockbuster.

The movie was shown on television to 50 million people in 12 countries on the fifth anniversary of 9/11 last autumn. More than 100,000 DVDs have been sold and another 50,000 have been given away. In Britain, 491,000 people have clicked on to Google Video to watch it on their computers.

Called Loose Change, the film is a blitz of statistics, photographs pinched from the web, eyewitness accounts and expert testimony, all set to hip-hop music. And it is dramatically changing the way people think about 9/11.

A recent poll by the respected New York Times revealed that three out of four Americans now suspect the U.S. government of not telling the truth about 9/11. This proportion has shot up from a year ago, when half the population said they did not believe the official story of an Al Qaeda attack.

The video claims the Bush administration was, at the very least, criminally negligent in allowing the terrorist attacks to take place. It also makes the startling claim that the U.S. government might have been directly responsible for 9/11 and is now orchestrating a cover-up.

Unsurprisingly, the film's allegations have been denied, even roundly condemned, by White House sources and U.S. intelligence services

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-435265/An-explosion-disbelief--fresh-doubts-9-11.html